'Into the Dalek' looks great
The Web Planet, season 2, 1965
The Snowmen / Deep Breath
Brb laughing to death
I’m surprised this doesn’t have more notes.
S C R E A M I NG
"He [The Doctor] will have other names before the end. The Storm, The Beast, The Valeyard.”
|—||Ancient Whovian Proverb (via liamgalgey)|
"Where do you think you are? Look around you. You’ve made it. The Promised Land.
P a r a d i s e.”
Dear STFU-Moffat and associates,
From now on, I insist you describe Steven Moffat as “Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat.” Just to make sure you’re being fair.
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat is a queerbaiting hack
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat’s writing features sexism and overly complicated plots that don’t really make any sense.
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat has characters needlessly tell the viewer information that he should be showing them.
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat is incapable of creating real emotional stakes in his stories.
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat calls teenage mother a ‘slut’ in DVD commentary
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat says bisexuals are too busy having sex to watch television, and therefore don’t need representing.
Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat thinks asexuals are too boring to write about.
Ah, yes. Because always, all the time, if someone gives somebody a prize, that automatically and necessarily means they deserved it and are the best in their field.
I think you’re pretty massively missing the point of my post. Which doesn’t surprise me, as making up intent so that you can pretend that your snarky little gif sets are legitimate criticism and insight rather than the substanceless bitching that it really is being kind of the go-to style of Moffat hate.
My point isn’t that having an Emmy automatically makes Steven Moffat a good writer, and that everyone has to love his work. My point is that having an Emmy does, in fact, make Steven Moffat pretty irrefutably a critically acclaimed writer. Which means that you don’t get to take the default position of “Steven Moffat sucks.” If you are going to take that position, then you now have a responsibility to respond to the critical consensus, not just by saying that it’s wrong, but saying why it’s wrong - responding to what is praised about Steven Moffat’s work and arguing specifically why the critics are wrong about that.
*sees post detailing exactly why Moffat’s writing sucks*
*says that no one is adequately explaining why his writing sucks*
Fucking haters should suck it up and stop being offended by everything. Bunch of bloody cuntweasels. How do you even live in the society. Someone calls women a women and you all “oh dear lord, how sexist it is oh ones!”
And speasking of which stop it with idiotic sexism schtick already. Unless I see Moff tying Sue on a leash in the kitchen or something I won’t buy any of your bullshit. Stop exaggarating and putting things out of context.
One of these day i’ll have to delete my shitty blog ‘cause off all bullshit i see here.
*complains that everyone is getting offended*
*gets way more angry than literally anyone else in the entire post*
Bite me then lol It’s not just that post and the whole thing. And besides. If someone can be petty biased little bitch why can’t I bee too sometimes.
And I’m not offended I’m protective spot the difference. Maybe just a little pissed *grin* NOT on quest for world’s justice in any way 8P